Ethereum Governance and Start of Projects
Ethereum’s governance model is a sophisticated, multi-layered approach that balances technical rigor, community participation, and decentralized decision-making. The governance process is designed to allow Ethereum to adapt to technological advancements, address security concerns, and respond to community needs. Here’s a deeper exploration of each component, with references and links to relevant resources for more in-depth learning.
1. Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs)
EIPs are the backbone of Ethereum’s development process, providing a standardised method for proposing new features, changes to protocol standards, or updates to network consensus. They are a primary way the community can contribute to the evolution of Ethereum.
EIP Lifecycle:
Draft Stage: A proposal is first created and discussed by the author.
Review Stage: It undergoes community review, particularly on Ethereum’s GitHub EIPs repository.
Last Call: If no major objections are raised, the proposal moves into a final review stage.
Final Status: EIPs marked “Final” are integrated into client implementations, becoming part of the Ethereum protocol.
Ethereum Request for Comments (ERCs) are subsets of EIPs specifically for application standards, especially token standards:
ERC-20: Standard for fungible tokens (widely used for creating tokens that have the same value and characteristics).
ERC-721: Standard for non-fungible tokens (NFTs), representing unique digital items.
ERC-1155: Allows multiple token types (fungible and non-fungible) in a single contract, streamlining batch transfers for gaming or collectibles.
For a list of all EIPs, visit ethereum.org’s EIP Page.
2. Role of Client Developers
Client developers work to implement and maintain the Ethereum protocol. Ethereum clients are software implementations that allow nodes to connect to and interact with the Ethereum blockchain. The main clients include:
Geth (Go Ethereum): Developed by the Ethereum Foundation, written in Go, and widely used for running Ethereum nodes. GitHub repository.
Nethermind: A C# client focused on speed and ease of use, with strong community support. Nethermind GitHub repository.
Besu: Developed by ConsenSys, written in Java, designed with enterprise use cases in mind. Besu GitHub repository.
Erigon: A more recent client, optimized for storage efficiency and high performance. Erigon GitHub repository.
Each client follows the Ethereum consensus rules, ensuring compatibility across the network. Changes to clients to include EIPs are discussed, tested on public testnets, and ultimately deployed on the mainnet through planned hard forks.
3. Core Developers Meetings
Ethereum’s core developers meet regularly to coordinate protocol upgrades, discuss technical issues, and assess the status of EIPs. These meetings are generally open to the public, livestreamed, and archived to ensure transparency.
Meeting Topics: Topics typically cover pending EIPs, testnet deployments, client issues, and network security.
Decision-Making: Consensus is reached through community and developer agreement rather than through formal voting. Technical feasibility and community feedback are critical factors in determining if an EIP progresses.
Meetings are posted on Ethereum Foundation's YouTube channel and archived on Ethereum Magicians, an open forum for discussion around EIPs and Ethereum improvement.
4. Off-Chain Governance
Ethereum’s governance also involves significant off-chain activities, allowing the community to discuss, refine, and support the protocol’s direction without relying solely on code-based changes.
GitHub: The Ethereum GitHub, particularly the EIPs repository, is the central hub for proposing, discussing, and tracking EIPs.
Ethereum Magicians Forum: A community forum for in-depth discussions on EIPs, technical issues, and community governance. Ethereum Magicians.
Twitter and Social Media: Community members and Ethereum developers frequently share insights, discuss changes, and gather community sentiment on platforms like Twitter.
This off-chain governance allows for flexibility, transparency, and broad participation by allowing community members to debate and vote informally on various issues. Although Ethereum lacks an official on-chain voting mechanism, this off-chain structure enables users to communicate preferences.
5. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
DAOs on Ethereum are on-chain governance structures allowing community members to vote on various aspects of protocol management, development, and funding. They can also facilitate decision-making without centralized control. Some well-known DAOs include:
MakerDAO: Manages the DAI stablecoin, where MKR holders vote on decisions like risk parameters, collateral assets, and other governance matters. MakerDAO’s Governance Portal.
Uniswap DAO: Controls Uniswap’s protocol, including treasury allocation, protocol upgrades, and other community decisions. Uniswap Governance Portal.
DAOs leverage Ethereum’s smart contracts to enable decentralized decision-making, allowing token holders to influence projects they support directly.
6. Token Holder Voting
Ethereum itself does not use a native on-chain voting system, but many projects on Ethereum do, allowing users to influence decision-making. These projects often issue governance tokens that can be used for voting, giving token holders influence over project upgrades, treasury allocation, and governance policies.
Uniswap (UNI): UNI token holders can submit proposals or vote on decisions impacting Uniswap, such as liquidity incentives or governance updates. Uniswap Voting Portal.
Compound (COMP): COMP holders govern decisions related to interest rate models, collateral options, and other settings in the Compound protocol. Compound Governance.
These mechanisms allow for more decentralized control within the Ethereum ecosystem, even if Ethereum itself does not enforce a formalized on-chain governance structure.
7. Ethereum Foundation (EF)
The Ethereum Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Ethereum’s development and ecosystem. While it does not control Ethereum, it provides significant financial and organizational resources for research, development, and protocol maintenance.
Funding and Grants: The Ethereum Foundation funds teams and initiatives that contribute to Ethereum’s development, like core client development, security research, and educational resources. Ethereum Foundation’s website.
Vision and Guidance: Although the Foundation provides strategic direction, it has no governing power over the Ethereum protocol. Instead, it acts as a steward to support Ethereum’s long-term success.
The Ethereum Foundation’s role is influential, but it operates within a decentralized ethos, collaborating with developers, researchers, and community members without central authority.
Example of Ethereum Governance in Action: The Merge
The Ethereum community’s transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), known as The Merge, showcases Ethereum’s governance model in action:
Proposal and EIPs: The transition began with proposals like EIP-3675, outlining the Merge’s specifications.
Development and Testing: The Merge underwent extensive testing on public testnets, with client developers coordinating updates across Geth, Besu, and others.
Community Engagement: Discussions and updates were widely shared on forums, Twitter, and developer calls, allowing the community to voice opinions, share concerns, and understand the process.
The Merge illustrates Ethereum’s ability to achieve consensus on protocol changes through collaboration, testing, and community-driven decision-making.
On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Governance in Ethereum
Ethereum’s hybrid governance model includes both on-chain mechanisms, used within specific DAOs, and off-chain processes that allow flexibility and broader participation:
On-Chain (DAOs and Token Voting): Used in projects like Uniswap and MakerDAO, where token holders vote on proposals directly.
Off-Chain (Core Dev Meetings, EIPs, Forums): Involves community-led discussions and meetings, as well as the EIP process for proposing protocol changes.
For more information on how Ethereum governance operates, check out ethereum.org’s page on governance for an overview of Ethereum’s decentralized approach.
Last updated